Collins (ID 79661) v. Bebb et al

Filing 73

ORDER denying 70 Motion for Injunctive Relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 10/29/2018. Mailed to pro se party plaintiff Jeremy Lee Collins by regular mail. (wh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS JEREMY LEE COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. ALEX BEBB, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 17-3050-CM ORDER This matter comes before upon plaintiff’s pro se Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 70). For the following reasons, this motion is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges he was subjected to excessive force by the defendants during his arrest on August 29, 2015. On April 17, 2018, the court stayed this action until May 8, 2019, based upon the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”), 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 501–596, because defendant Alex Bebb had been assigned to active duty for the United States Army to participate in Operation Enduring Freedom beginning April 3, 2018. On August 17, 2018, plaintiff filed the instant motion. In his motion, plaintiff asks the court to enjoin the prison from restrictions that preclude him from litigating this case. Specifically, he points to prison regulations that prevent him from making copies because he does not have enough money in his prison account. Since this case is stayed, the court sees no reason to provide any relief at this time. The court can address this issue if plaintiff continues to have these problems when the stay is vacated. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 70) is denied without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 29th day of October, 2018, at Topeka, Kansas. s/ K. Gary Sebelius K. Gary Sebelius U.S. Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?