Long v. Greene et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/10/18. Mailed to pro se party Brandon Neil Long by regular mail. (smnd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
BRANDON NEIL LONG,
CASE NO. 17-3106-SAC
(FNU) GREENE, and SEDGWICK
COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff brings this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. At the time of
filing, Plaintiff was incarcerated at the Sedgwick County Jail in Wichita, Kansas. Plaintiff
alleges in his Complaint that on August 26, 2014, Defendant Greene, a detective, used excessive
force when questioning Plaintiff in the sally port about a battery committed by another inmate.
Defendant Greene told Plaintiff that he was “pissing him off” and “to cuff up.” Greene did not
have handcuffs and before Plaintiff could comply with the request, Greene slammed Plaintiff
face-first onto the floor. Plaintiff returned to the clinic five days later to have stitches removed.
One stitch was left in and Plaintiff had to return to the clinic again to have that stitch removed.
Plaintiff names Detective Greene and the Sedgwick County Detention Facility as defendants, and
seeks $100,000 in damages.
On November 3, 2017, the Court entered a Memorandum and Order to Show Cause
(“MOSC”) (Doc. 6), giving Plaintiff until December 1, 2017, to show cause why his case should
not be dismissed for the reasons set forth in the MOSC. The Court granted Plaintiff an extension
of time to January 5, 2018, in which to show good cause why his Complaint should not be
dismissed for the reasons stated in the MOSC at Doc. 6. (Doc. 8.) The Court’s Order at Doc. 8
granting an extension of time was mailed to Plaintiff’s current address of record and was
returned to sender with a notation that Plaintiff is no longer in custody. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff has
failed to respond to the MOSC and has failed to provide the Court with a current address of
record. The Court’s Local Rules provide that “[e]ach attorney or pro se party must notify the
clerk in writing of any change of address or telephone numbers. Any notice mailed to the last
address of record of an attorney or pro se party is sufficient notice.” D. Kan. Rule 5.1(c)(3).
In the MOSC, the Court found that it plainly appears from the face of the Complaint that
Plaintiff’s claims are subject to dismissal as barred by the applicable two-year statute of
limitations. Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 28, 2017, his alleged incident of excessive
force occurred on August 26, 2014, and his medical care claim occurred five days later. The
Court also found that this action is subject to dismissal as against Defendant Sedgwick County
Detention Facility, because prison and jail facilities are not a “person” subject to suit for money
damages under § 1983.
The Court also found that Plaintiff’s medical claim is subject to
dismissal for failure to allege a constitutional violation. The Eighth Amendment prohibits
“deliberate indifference to a prisoner’s serious illness or injury.” Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97,
104–05 (1976). However, a claim of medical malpractice lacks constitutional significance, and
instead is a tort claim that must be pursued in the state courts. See id. at 106 (“[A] complaint that
a physician has been negligent in diagnosing or treating a medical condition does not state a
valid claim of medical mistreatment under the Eighth Amendment.”). Plaintiff’s allegations
reflect at most negligence. Although Plaintiff fails to identify any named defendant regarding
his medical claim, his allegations reflect that he received medical care for his injury and to
remove the overlooked suture. Plaintiff has failed to state a claim of deliberate indifference to
his medical needs.
The Court’s MOSC required Plaintiff to show good cause why his Complaint should not
be dismissed for the reasons stated therein. Plaintiff has failed to address the deficiencies. The
Court finds that this case should be dismissed due to the deficiencies set forth in the MOSC.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that this action is dismissed for
failure to state a claim.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated in Topeka, Kansas, on this 10th day of January, 2018.
S/ Sam A. Crow
Sam A. Crow
U.S. Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?