Hughes (ID 96576) v. Secretary of Corrections

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dismissing the petition for habeas corpus without prejudice. Petitioner's 5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/27/2017. Mailed to pro se party Charley Hughes by regular mail. (mls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CHARLEY HUGHES, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 17-3204-SAC WARDEN DAN SCHNURR, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 28, 2017, the Court directed petition to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed without prejudice due to his apparent failure to exhaust state court remedies. Petitioner filed a timely response, in which he states that he filed a petition in the District Court of Butler County, Kansas, on October 26, 2017. However, he states the Clerk of that court “returned [his] 2254” and directed him to file it in federal court (Doc. #4). If the pleading in question was identified as a petition under section 2254, the direction to file it in federal court was appropriate, as 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is the federal habeas statute for actions attacking a state court judgment. However, a petitioner does not exhaust his claims in the state courts by misfiling an action under section 2254 in state court. Instead, petitioner must present the claims for relief to the state courts under the correct state law provisions. If he is unsuccessful in the state district court, he then must present his claims to the state appellate courts to satisfy the exhaustion requirement. See O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999)(state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus relief first must “give[] the state courts one full opportunity to resolve any constitutional issues by invoking one complete round of the State’s established appellate review process.”). Because petitioner has not done so, the Court will dismiss this matter without prejudice. IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED the petition for habeas corpus is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #5) is denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: This 27th day of December, 2017, at Topeka, Kansas. S/ Sam A. Crow SAM A. CROW U.S. Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?