Murphy v. Corwine et al

Filing 7

ORDER denying 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and adopting Report and Recommendations 4 . This case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 8/28/17. (msb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ROBIN DEAN MURPHY, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 17-4066-SAC JACKIE DUANE CORWIN, et al., Defendants. O R D E R This case is before the court upon the report recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Sebelius. No. 4. and Doc. The report and recommendation, which was filed on July 31, 2017, concludes after a review of plaintiff’s complaint and attached materials that the case should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot. Under the provisions of FED.R.CIV.P. 72(b)(2), plaintiff has 14 days after being served with a copy of the report and recommendation to serve and file specific written objections. The record reflects that plaintiff was served with a copy of the report and Plaintiff recommendation has recommendation. failed Upon to no later timely review, than object the court August to 7, the report agrees with 2017. and Judge Sebelius that plaintiff has not alleged facts demonstrating a 1 jurisdictional defendants in basis to federal hear his court. claims against Therefore, the the report named and recommendation is adopted in full and the court directs that this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 28th day of August, 2017, at Topeka, Kansas. s/Sam A. Crow Sam A. Crow, U.S. District Senior Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?