Murphy v. Corwine et al
ORDER denying 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and adopting Report and Recommendations 4 . This case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 8/28/17. (msb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
ROBIN DEAN MURPHY,
Case No. 17-4066-SAC
JACKIE DUANE CORWIN, et al.,
O R D E R
recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Sebelius.
The report and recommendation, which was filed on July
31, 2017, concludes after a review of plaintiff’s complaint and
attached materials that the case should be dismissed for lack of
proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot.
Under the provisions of FED.R.CIV.P. 72(b)(2), plaintiff
has 14 days after being served with a copy of the report and
recommendation to serve and file specific written objections.
The record reflects that plaintiff was served with a copy of the
Sebelius that plaintiff has not alleged facts demonstrating a
recommendation is adopted in full and the court directs that
this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction and that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in
forma pauperis be denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 28th day of August, 2017, at Topeka, Kansas.
s/Sam A. Crow
Sam A. Crow, U.S. District Senior Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?