Waterman v. Board of Commissioners of Columbus, Kansas et al

Filing 114

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 108 plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 05/13/2019. Mailed to pro se party Brian Michael Waterman by regular mail. (tvn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS BRIAN WATERMAN, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COLUMBUS, KANSAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 18-3135-CM-KGG MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Brian Waterman, a prisoner in the Sedgwick County Jail, brings this civil rights action pro se against a number of defendants associated with Cherokee County Jail. The case is before the court on several motions, but the court only addresses one here: plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 108). Plaintiff claims that defendants Jonathan Manzer, Manzer Health Clinic, and APRN Kristin Wagner failed to answer summons. But instead of filing an answer, defendants Manzer and Manzer Health Clinic timely filed motions to dismiss (Docs. 93–96.) Under the Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, defendants have the option of whether to file an answer or a pre-answer motion. Default judgment is not appropriate against defendant Manzer and Manzer Health Clinic. As for defendant APRN Kristin Wagner, it does not appear that a waiver of service or a return of service has been filed. Because it does not appear that this defendant has been served with process, default judgment is also not appropriate against her. -1- IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 108) is denied. Dated this 13th day of May, 2019, at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ Carlos Murguia_____________ CARLOS MURGUIA United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?