Waterman v. Board of Commissioners of Columbus, Kansas et al

Filing 126

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 123 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 7/15/19. Mailed to pro se party Brian Michael Waterman by regular mail. (df)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS BRIAN WATERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BOARD OF COUNTY ) COMMISSIONERSOF CHEROKEE ) COUNTY, KANSAS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________ ) Case No. 18-3135-CM-KGG MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for counsel. (Doc. 123.) Plaintiff has filed four prior motions requesting counsel (Docs. 12, 46, 59, 89) all of which have been denied without prejudice (Docs. 14, 48, 82, 90). In the most recent of Plaintiff’s prior requests for counsel (Doc. 89), the Court found no justification for appointing counsel but indicated the issue would be revisited if Plaintiff survived Defendants’ dispositive motion. (Doc. 90, at 2.) The District Court recently granted in part and denied in part (Doc. 122) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 97). The undersigned Magistrate Judge notes that the claims that survived dismissal are not particularly complicated. Cf. Kayhill v. Unified Govern. of Wyandotte, 197 F.R.D. 454, 458 (D.Kan. 2000) (finding that the “factual and legal issues” in a case involving a former employee’s allegations of race, religion, sex, national origin, and disability discrimination were “not complex”). Further, Plaintiff has demonstrated the ability to represent himself, particularly in opposing the dispositive motion. As such, the Court sees no basis to distinguish Plaintiff from the many other untrained individuals who represent themselves pro se on various types of claims in Courts throughout the United States on any given day. Although Plaintiff is not trained as an attorney, and while an attorney might present this case more effectively, this fact alone does not warrant appointment of counsel. The Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 123) is, therefore, DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 15th day of July, 2019, at Wichita, Kansas. S/ KENNETH G. GALE HON. KENNETH G. GALE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?