Harkless v. Saline County Jail et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Signed by Senior U.S. District Judge Sam A. Crow on 02/16/21. Mailed to pro se party Everett Ray Harkless by regular mail. (smnd)

Download PDF
Case 5:20-cv-03281-SAC Document 8 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS EVERETT RAY HARKLESS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 20-3281-SAC SALINE COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff brings this pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is housed at the Saline County Jail in Salina, Kansas (“SCJ”). The Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On January 14, 2021, the Court entered a Memorandum and Order and Order to Show Cause (Doc. 7) (“MOSC”) granting Plaintiff until February 12, 2021, in which to show good cause why his Complaint should not be dismissed for the reasons set forth in the MOSC or to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Plaintiff has failed to respond by the Court’s deadline. The Court found in the MOSC that Plaintiff’s allegations do not show a complete lack of medical care, but rather show Plaintiff’s disagreement regarding the proper course of treatment or medication. Plaintiff has failed to show that any defendant was deliberately indifferent regarding his medical care and has failed to show that Defendants disregarded an excessive risk to his health or safety or that they were both aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm existed, and also drew the inference. Plaintiff’s claims suggest, at most, negligence. The MOSC provides that “[i]f Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within the prescribed time that cures all the deficiencies discussed herein, this matter will be decided based 1    Case 5:20-cv-03281-SAC Document 8 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2 upon the current deficient Complaint and may be dismissed without further notice.” (Doc. 7, at 10.) Plaintiff has failed to respond to the MOSC and has failed to show good cause why his Complaint should not be dismissed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that this matter is dismissed for failure to state a claim. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated February 16, 2021, in Topeka, Kansas. S/ Sam A. Crow SAM A. CROW SENIOR U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?