Monsour et al v. Menu Maker Foods Inc

Filing 103

Proposed Jury Instructions by Monsour's, Inc..(DeVaughn, Dustin)

Download PDF
Monsour et al v. Menu Maker Foods Inc Doc. 103 Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 103 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 1 of 8 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MONSOUR'S, INC. Plaintiff, v. MENU MAKER FOODS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 05-1204-MLB PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS Plaintiff Monsour's, Inc., (hereinafter "Monsour's"), by and through its counsel of record, Dustin L. DeVaughn and Richard W. James of McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn & Herrington, P.A., provides the Court with plaintiff's proposed jury instructions as follows: Instruction No. 1. A contract is an agreement between two or more persons consisting of a set of promises that are legally enforceable. Shofler v. Jordan, 284 S.W.2d 612 (Mo. App. 1955); see also generally PIK, 3d 124.01 for additional guidance and authority. Instruction No. 2. The essential elements of an action based on a contract are: (1) The existence of a valid contract; (2) The rights and obligations of the respective parties; (3) The defendant's breach of the contract; and (4) Damages to plaintiff caused by the breach. Howe v. ALD Services, Inc., 941 S.W.2d 645 (Mo. App. E.D. 1997); cf., PIK, 3d 124.01 Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 103 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 2 of 8 Instruction No. 3. A contract may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement. It may be oral or written, or implied from the conduct of the parties. An agreement is sufficient to constitute a contract even though the exact time of its making cannot be determined. MO. ANN. STAT. 400.2-204(1) and Computer Network, Ltd. v. Purcell Tire & Rubber Co. 747 S.W.2d 669 (Mo. App. E.D. 1988); see generally also PIK, 3d 124.03 Instruction No. 4. A promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forebearance of a definite and substantial character on the part of the promise and which does induce such action or forebearance, is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise. Restatement of Contracts (Second), §90 subsection 1; Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenber., 683 S.W.2d 691 (Mo. App. E.D. 1984); see generally also PIK, 3d 124.13 Instruction No. 5. A contract may be modified or changed by a later oral or written agreement. Whether or not the parties to this action have modified or changed the original contract is for you to determine. Willis v. Community Developers, Inc. 563. S.W.2d 104 (Mo. App. 1978); PIK, 3d 124.16 Instruction No. 6. With respect to plaintiff's breach of contract claim concerning the food service inventory, your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe: First, plaintiff and defendant entered into any agreement whereby defendant agreed to purchase all of plaintiff's inventory, except produce, which is in a good, wholesome and 100% 2 Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 103 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 3 of 8 resellable condition and which are presently being sold to current customers of defendant or to selected customers of plaintiff, the estimated value of which the parties determined to be $750,000 to $800,000, and Second, plaintiff performed its agreement, and Third, defendant failed to perform its agreement, and Fourth, plaintiff was thereby damaged. MISSOURI APPROVED INSTRUCTIONS (MAI), 26.06 (1981 Revision) Instruction No. 7. With respect to plaintiff's breach of contract claim concerning the remaining food service inventory defendant was to give its best efforts to sell or to assist in the sale, your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe: First, plaintiff and defendant entered into any agreement whereby defendant agreed to make its best efforts to sell or assist in the sale of plaintiff's remaining food service inventory, and Second, plaintiff performed its agreement, and Third, defendant failed to perform its agreement, and Fourth, plaintiff was thereby damaged. MISSOURI APPROVED INSTRUCTIONS (MAI), 26.06 (1981 Revision) Instruction No. 8. With respect to plaintiff's breach of contract claim concerning produce, your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe: 3 Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 103 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 4 of 8 First, plaintiff and defendant entered into any agreement whereby defendant agreed to purchase substantially all of its produce requirements through Monsour's that met or exceeded defendant's house acceptability standards, and Second, plaintiff performed its agreement, and Third, defendant failed to perform its agreement, and Fourth, plaintiff was thereby damaged. MISSOURI APPROVED INSTRUCTIONS (MAI), 26.06 (1981 Revision) Instruction No. 9 When the buyer fails to pay the price as it becomes due, the seller may recover the price of goods accepted or of conforming goods lost or damaged within a commercially reasonable time after risk of their loss has passed to the buyer. MO. ANN. STAT. 400.2-709(1)(a). Instruction No. 10 When the buyer fails to pay the price as it becomes due, the seller may recover the price of goods identified to the contract if the seller is unable after reasonable effort to resell them at a reasonable price or the circumstances reasonably indicate that such effort will be unavailing. MO. ANN. STAT. 400.2-709(1)(b). Instruction No. 11 For future lost sales, the measure of damages is the profit (including reasonable overhead) which the seller would have made from full performance by the buyer, together with any incidental damages. MO. ANN. STAT. 400.2-708(2). 4 Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 103 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 5 of 8 Instruction No. 12. If you find for the plaintiff, then you should award the plaintiff such sum as you believe will fairly and justly compensate the plaintiff for the damages you believe it sustained as a direct result of the breach of contract by the defendant. In determining plaintiff's damages you should consider any of the following elements of damage that you find were the result of the breach: a. Damages for breach of contract pertaining to the food service inventory that was to be purchased, amounting to $500,000. b. Damages for breach of contract pertaining to the remaining food service inventory that defendant was to make its best efforts to sell or assist in the sale amounting to $216,414.35; and c. to $1,204,350. The total amount of your verdict may not exceed the sum of $1,920,764.40, the amount of plaintiff's claim. PIK, 3d 124.16 Damages for breach of contract pertaining to the purchase of produce amounting 5 Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 103 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 6 of 8 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Dustin L. DeVaughn___________ Dustin L. DeVaughn, #16559 Richard W. James, #19822 Donald H. Snook, #21775 Attorney for Plaintiffs McDONALD, TINKER, SKAER, QUINN & HERRINGTON, P.A. R.H. Garvey Building 300 West Douglas Avenue, Suite 500 P.O. Box 207 Wichita, KS 67202-2909 Telephone: (316) 263-5851 Fax: (316) 263-4677 Email: ddevaughn@mtsqh.com rjames@mtsqh.com dsnook@mtsqh.com 6 Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 103 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 7 of 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 29th day of December, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to the following: John Val Wachtel Alex Mitchell Klenda, Mitchell, Austerman & Zuercher, Suite 1600, 201 North Main, Wichita, KS 67202 Tele: 316.267.0221 Fax: 316.267.0333 jvwachtes@kmazlaw.com Attorney for Defendant Jeffrey Eastman Keleher & Eastman Law Firm 403 N.W. Englewood Rd. Gladstone MO 64118 Business Tele: 816.452.6030 Fax: 816.455.0969 Home: 816.436.1506 Cell: 816.213.0819 jse@keleher-eastman.com Attorney for Defendant And a courtesy copy was hand delivered to the chambers of: Honorable Monti L. Belot 7 Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 103 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 8 of 8 s/ Dustin L. DeVaughn___________ Dustin L. DeVaughn, #16559 Richard W. James, #19822 Donald H. Snook,#21775 Attorney for Plaintiffs McDONALD, TINKER, SKAER, QUINN & HERRINGTON, P.A. R.H. Garvey Building 300 West Douglas Avenue, Suite 500 P.O. Box 207 Wichita, KS 67202-2909 Telephone: (316) 263-5851 Fax: (316) 263-4677 Email: ddevaughn@mtsqh.com rjames@mtsqh.com dsnook@mtsqh.com 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?