Monsour et al v. Menu Maker Foods Inc

Filing 125

RESPONSE by Plaintiff Monsour's, Inc. re 117 MOTION for Summary Judgment (James, Richard)

Download PDF
Monsour et al v. Menu Maker Foods Inc Doc. 125 Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 125 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 3 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARK MONSOUR, SHEILA MONSOUR and MONSOUR'S, INC. Plaintiffs, v. MENU MAKER FOODS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 05-1204-MLB RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S THIRD MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR RULING BY THE COURT ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel of record, Dustin L. DeVaughn and Richard W. James of McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn & Herrington, P.A., assert that defendant's Third Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 117] and Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's denial of its previous motion for summary judgment should be denied. Defendant's multiple efforts at summary judgment have been repeatedly considered by this Court. Defendant has not obtained summary judgment and continues to file motions before this Court. Further, this motion is filed after the deadline for dispositive motions which was June 19, 2006. Plaintiffs' counsel will not draft a separate response but instead rely upon the responses previously filed with this Court. See Documents Nos. 88, 104 and 113. Defendant also adopts the arguments in its Memorandum and Motion in Support of enforcing the settlement agreement. [Doc. 123]. As outlined in that document, the Pretrial Order that defendant relies upon in support of 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 125 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 2 of 3 its motion has not been completed by plaintiffs' counsel because the parties agreed to settle the case. For the above and foregoing reasons, defendant's Third Motion for Summary Judgment should be denied. s/ Richard W. James___________ Dustin L. DeVaughn, #16559 Richard W. James, #19822 Donald H. Snook, #21775 Attorneys for Plaintiffs McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn & Herrington, P.A. 300 W. Douglas Ave., Ste. 500 P.O. Box 207 Wichita, KS 67201-0207 Telephone: (316) 263-5851 Facsimile: (316) 263-4677 Email: ddevaughn@mtsqh.com rjames@mtsqh.com dsnook@mtsqh.com 2 Case 6:05-cv-01204-JTM Document 125 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 16th day of April, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to the following: John Val Wachtel Alex Mitchell Klenda, Mitchell, Austerman & Zuercher, 201 N Main, Ste. 1600 Wichita, Kansas 67202 Telephone: 316-267-0221 Facsimile: 316-267-0333 E-mail: jvwachtes@kmazlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Eastman Keleher & Eastman Law Firm 403 N.W. Englewood Rd. Gladstone Missouri 64118 Business Ph: 816-452-6030 Facsimile: 816-455-0969 Home Ph: 816-436-1506 Cell Ph: 816-213-0819 E-mail: jse@keleher-eastman.com Attorneys for Defendant s/ Richard W. James___________ Dustin L. DeVaughn, #16559 Richard W. James, #19822 Donald H. Snook,#21775 Attorneys for Plaintiffs McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn & Herrington, P.A. 300 W. Douglas Ave., Ste. 500 P.O. Box 207 Wichita, Kansas 67201-0207 Telephone: (316) 263-5851 Facsimile: (316) 263-4677 Email: ddevaughn@mtsqh.com rjames@mtsqh.com dsnook@mtsqh.com 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?