Gamache v. United States of America

Filing 5

ORDER - The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation by Judge Humphreys and hereby adopts it in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #3) filed March 22, 2011, be and hereb y is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint be and hereby is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 7/7/2011. Mailed to pro se party Gregory Gamache by certified mail. (Certified Tracking Number: 7002 2030 0000 9348 2518)(kao)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS GREGORY GAMACHE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) CIVIL ACTION No. 11-1085-KHV ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys’ Report And Recommendation (Doc. #4) filed June 14, 2011, regarding plaintiff’s Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Supporting Documentation And Order (Doc. #3) filed March 22, 2011. Judge Humphreys recommended that the Court deny plaintiff’s motion and dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) because the United States is immune from this suit, and because the complaint has no arguable basis in law or fact and is frivolous. The deadline for filing objections to the report and recommendation was June 28, 2011. The parties have not objected. The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation by Judge Humphreys and hereby adopts it in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Supporting Documentation And Order (Doc. #3) filed March 22, 2011 be and hereby is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint be and hereby is DISMISSED. Dated this 7th day of July, 2011 at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ Kathryn H. Vratil KATHRYN H. VRATIL United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?