Watchous Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Pacific National Capital et al

Filing 107

ORDER granting 99 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer. Movants shall file their amended answer by February 7, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 2/1/2018. Mailed to the defendant Waterfall entities and defendant William J Mournes by regular mail. (amh) Modified to mail to additional parties by regular mail per chambers on 2/1/2018 (ydm).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS WATCHOUS ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-1432-JTM PACIFIC NATIONAL CAPITAL, et al., Defendants. ORDER Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), defendants Pacific National Capital, Charles A. Elfsten, and Mark M. Hasegawa have filed a motion for leave to file an amended answer that pleads a crossclaim1 against defendants Waterfall Mountain USA LLC, Waterfall Mountain LLC, and Waterfall International Holdings Limited (collectively, “the Waterfall defendants”) (ECF No. 99). Under the time requirements set forth in D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d), any response to the motion was due on January 31, 2018. No timely opposition has been filed. D. Kan. Rule 7.4 provides, “If a responsive brief or memorandum is not filed within the Rule 6.1(d) time requirements, the court will consider and decide the motion as an uncontested motion. Ordinarily the court will grant the motion without further notice.” The court considers the motion unopposed and grants it without further notice. 1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(g). O:\ORDERS\16-1432-JTM-99.wpd Movants shall file their amended answer by February 7, 2018. As the court has informed the Waterfall defendants on multiple occasions,2 corporations may not appear pro se. Thus, the Waterfall defendants are again urged to secure counsel should they wish to answer the crossclaim. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated February 1, 2018, at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ James P. O’Hara James P. O’Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge 2 See ECF Nos. 37, 39, & 68. O:\ORDERS\16-1432-JTM-99.wpd -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?