Watchous Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Pacific National Capital et al

Filing 369

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 364 Motion for Extension of Time to File; denying as moot 366 Amended Motion for Extension of Time to File. Consistent with a new Administrative Order by the District of Kansas, which continues all trials pending through the end of 2020 in light of the Covid-19 virus, the court hereby continues the trial scheduled for December 1, 2020. Trial is set for February 9, 2021. All remaining pretrial dates are hereby continued as well, and will be res et by subsequent notice. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 11/16/2020. Mailed to pro se parties Pacific National Capital c/o Charles A. Elfsten, Waterfall Mountain USA, LLC, Waterfall Mountain, LLC, Waterfall International Holdings Limited, and William Mournes by regular mail. (sz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS WATCHOUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. No. 16-1432-JTM PACIFIC NATIONAL CAPITAL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Consistent with a new Administrative Order by the District of Kansas, which continues all trials pending through the end of 2020 in light of the Covid-19 virus, the court hereby continues the trial scheduled for December 1, 2020. In light of this continuance, the Pacific defendants’ Emergency Motions (Dkt. 364, 366), based upon the health of defendant William Mournes, are denied as moot. Should the motion be renewed, it must be accompanied by Mr. Mournes’s complete medical records for the last year, including hospitalization records, along with the name of all treating physicians and their records. Trial is set for February 9, 2021. All remaining pretrial dates are hereby continued as well, and will be reset by subsequent notice. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of November, 2020. J. Thomas Marten J. Thomas Marten, Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?