Brahma Group, Inc. v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.

Filing 51

ORDER granting 49 motion to compel discovery responses. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 10/22/2018. (amh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
BRAHMA GROUP, INC.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP.,
Defendant.

Case No. 17-1076-JWB

ORDER
Plaintiff, Brahma Group, Inc., has filed a motion to compel (ECF No. 49) defendant,
Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., to respond to interrogatories and requests for production of
documents that fall into four categories:
1) Personnel files of three key Cargill employees;
2) The bonus structure applicable to key Cargill employees;
3) Production information for Cargill’s Dodge City facility; and
4) Safety and incident reports concerning instances at the Dodge City facility
during the time of Brahma’s work.1

1

The motion states defendant objected to this discovery on relevance grounds.
1

O:\ORDERS\17-1076-JWB-49.docx

The motion was filed on October 5, 2018, making October 19, 2018, the deadline for
defendant to respond.2 Defendant has filed no response to the motion, and it is therefore
granted as unopposed.3 Defendant is hereby ordered to respond to the subject discovery
requests by November 5, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated October 22, 2018, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ James P. O=Hara
James P. O=Hara
U.S. Magistrate Judge

2

See D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d)(1).

See D. Kan. Rule 7.4(b) (“If a responsive brief or memorandum is not filed within
the D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d) time requirements, the court will consider and decide the motion
as an uncontested motion. Ordinarily, the court will grant the motion without further
notice.”).
2
3

O:\ORDERS\17-1076-JWB-49.docx