Peoples v. Wichita State University

Filing 109

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1), the action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The pending motions (Docs. 87 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge John W. Broomes on 12/11/2019. Mailed to pro se party Darrell Peoples at 1653 N Bluff Ave. Wichita, KS 67208 and Floria Clark at 2395 N Beacon Hill St. # 702 Wichita, KS 67220 by regular mail. (mam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS DARRELL PEOPLES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-1010-JWB WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This action alleging employment discrimination was filed pro se by Plaintiff on January 8, 2018. (Doc. 1.) On August 31, 2019, Defendant filed a suggestion of death asserting that Plaintiff Darrell Peoples had died. (Doc. 107.) A return of service was subsequently filed showing Defendant had caused personal service of a summons on Floria Clark (Plaintiff’s mother), on September 4, 2019. (Doc. 108.) Rule 25 provides in part that if a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party, and a motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent’s successor or representative. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). “If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.” Id. The court finds that no motion for substitution has been made within 90 days after service of a statement noting Plaintiff’s death. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1), the action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The pending motions (Docs. 87, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99) are DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of December, 2019. _____s/ John W. Broomes__________ JOHN W. BROOMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?