Raben v. Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Filing
19
ORDER: The court enters the parties' proposed agreed order authorizing disclosure of medical, health, and employment records for plaintiff. The court amended the parties' proposed agreed order to remove language ordering non-parties to produce documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 1/16/2019. (amh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
AT WICHITA, KANSAS
LUCYNDA RABEN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 18-cv-1183-EFM
vs.
FARM BUREAU PROPERTY &
CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
PURSUANT TO K.S.A. CHAPTER 60
AGREED ORDER AUTHORIZING INSPECTION AND REPRODUCTION OF
MEDICAL, EMPLOYMENT, AND PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION
PURSUANT TO STATE AND FEDERAL LAW (HIPAA) AND
NOTIFICATION OF WAIVER OF PHYSICIAN-PATIENT PRIVILEGE
TO:
All Hospitals, Clinics, Pharmacies, Physicians, Social Workers, Psychologists,
Psychiatrists, Therapists; Governmental Agencies (State and Federal); All Other Medical
Institutions, Practitioners and Health Care Providers; and All Employers, Past and
Present
You are hereby authorized pursuant to the laws of the State of Kansas and applicable
federal law, including but not limited to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA), to make available for examination and reproduction by the parties and their counsel
denominated in this lawsuit any and all medical and employment records of any type or nature
whatsoever and/or any protected health information within your care, custody, or in any manner
concerning Lucynda J. Raben, DDS, Date of Birth: ________ (year only), Social Security
Number: ________(last 4 digits).
Medical documents and protected health information subject to this order include
but are not limited to:
Every page of the entire medical chart cover to cover, including but not limited to: all
records pertaining to the examination, diagnosis, care and/or treatment of the patient;
patient intake and registration forms; patient insurance and identification information;
office narratives; progress notes; prescription orders; lab results; nurse and physician
assistant notes; consultation notes; consultation reports; order sheets; handwritten notes;
and, radiological and laboratory reports; itemized billing statements listing all charges;
radiographic films; photographs; videotapes; and,
All secondary records, regardless of whether generated by you. Secondary records
include patient questionnaires, phone message slips, correspondence with patient and
other health care providers, and all documents contained in the medical chart from other
health care providers, insurance representatives, attorneys or governmental agencies,
including but not limited to: medical records as defined above and all correspondence
and hospitalization records.
The Court specifically finds the above-requested information is necessary to this
proceeding because the parties rely on the information as an element of the claims and defenses
in the action. Unless specifically excluded by this Order, all medical records and protected health
information in your possession regarding the person noted above may be produced or made
available for inspection. Said inspection and/or reproduction may be requested by any attorney of
record herein as set forth below, and clerical fees and expenses shall be paid by the attorney
requesting such examination, reproduction or interview. Copies of such records secured under
this Order by counsel for defendant shall be made available for inspection or copying by the
attorney for plaintiff, or copies shall be made of such records for and at the expense of the
attorneys for plaintiff.
Over plaintiff’s objection, it is ordered that counsel for either party is allowed to confer
with any health care provider without opposing counsel or opposing party being present,
provided the health care provider consents to the interview. This is based on the Court’s finding
that the plaintiff has made a claim for personal injuries and in filing this lawsuit, has waived any
privilege existing between the patient and the health care providers.
This Order complies with HIPAA federal standards for privacy of individually
identifiable health information, 45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164, and Kansas Statute, K.S.A. 60-427,
Physician-Patient Privilege.
This Order encompasses disclosure of all information regarding diagnosis and
treatment of mental, alcohol, drug dependency, emotional condition, and HIV, AIDS or other
infectious disease, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 290dd-2 and 42 C.F.R. Part 2 (substance abuse
privilege); K.S.A. 65-5601 to 5606 (treatment facility privilege); K.S.A. 74-5323 and K.S.A. 745372 (psychologist-patient privilege); and K.S.A. 65-6001 to 6010 (infectious disease privilege).
Disclosure of all records pursuant to these sections are necessary for purposes of the litigation
and essential to the claims and defenses of the parties.
With respect to the employment records, such records include but are not limited
to all materials contained in the employee’s personnel file cover to cover; wage, payment, salary
and tax information; performance evaluations; job applications; workers compensation records
and any other records pertaining to injuries incurred by the employee; any and all work releases
or restrictions; any protected health information in the employer’s records.
This Order shall be effective throughout the pendency of this action.
Dated January 16, 2019, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ James P. O’Hara
James P. O’Hara
U.S. Magistrate Judge
APPROVED:
DEVAUGHN JAMES INJURY LAWYERS
By:/s/Dustin L. DeVaughn__________________
Dustin L. DeVaughn #16559
DeVaughn James Injury Lawyers
3241 N. Toben
Wichita, KS 67226
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HITE, FANNING & HONEYMAN L.L.P.
By:__/s/Brad J. LaForge________________
Brad J. LaForge, #20323
HITE, FANNING & HONEYMAN L.L.P.
100 N. Broadway, Ste. 950
Wichita, KS 67202-2209
Telephone: (316) 265-7741
Facsimile: (316) 267-7803
E-mail: laforge@hitefanning.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?