Goico v. United States Government et al

Filing 26

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 25 Motion for Default Judgment. Based upon the documents Plaintiff has filed, there is no evidence that Plaintiff delivered a copy of the summons and the complaint to the United States Attorney for the District of Kansas. Signed by District Judge John W. Broomes on 7/23/2020. Mailed to pro se party Peter Mario Goico 1254 N Pine Grove Ct Wichita, KS 67212 by regular mail. (sz)

Case 6:20-cv-01025-JWB-GEB Document 26 Filed 07/23/20 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
PETER MARIO GOICO,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 20-1025-JWB

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s renewed motion for default judgment (Doc.
25). For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff’s renewed motion for default judgment is DENIED.
On April 23, 2020, this court entered an order granting Plaintiff’s motion for extension of
time to serve Defendants. (Doc. 16). Plaintiff moved for default judgment on the basis that
Defendants failed to file an answer within 21 days of being served but Plaintiff failed to attach
documentation showing proof of service. (Doc. 19.) The court denied the motion on that basis
and because Defendants are entitled to serve an answer within 60 days of service on the United
States Attorney. (Doc. 20) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(2)).
After the order was entered, Plaintiff filed the returns showing service. Those documents
show that the Department of Justice was served at 950 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C.
on May 13, 2020, and that President Trump’s summons was delivered to the White House on May
9, 2020. (Doc. 21.) Defendant Stephan Hahn was served on June 18, 2020. (Doc. 23.)
According to the returns, although 60 days has passed since Defendants Department of
Justice and President Trump have been served, 60 days have not passed since Defendant Hahn was
served. Moreover, Plaintiff has failed to serve the United States as required by Fed. R. Civ. P.

Case 6:20-cv-01025-JWB-GEB Document 26 Filed 07/23/20 Page 2 of 2

4(i). Under that rule, “[t]o serve a United States agency or corporation, or a United States officer
or employee sued only in an official capacity, a party must serve the United States and also send
a copy of the summons and of the complaint by registered or certified mail to the agency,
corporation, officer, or employee.” Rule 4(i)(2)(emphasis supplied).1
To serve the United States, a party must:
(A)(i) deliver a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the United States
attorney for the district where the action is brought--or to an assistant United
States attorney or clerical employee whom the United States attorney designates in
a writing filed with the court clerk--or
(ii) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the civil-process clerk at
the United States attorney's office;
(B) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of
the United States at Washington, D.C.; and
(C) if the action challenges an order of a nonparty agency or officer of the United
States, send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the agency or officer.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1) (emphasis supplied).
Based upon the documents Plaintiff has filed, there is no evidence that Plaintiff delivered
a copy of the summons and the complaint to the United States Attorney for the District of Kansas.
Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion is denied.
Conclusion
Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Doc. 25) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of July, 2020.
____s/ John W. Broomes_____
JOHN W. BROOMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

The court notes that even if Plaintiff was suing Defendants in their personal capacity in connection with duties
performed on the United States’ behalf, Plaintiff is still required to serve the United States by sending the summons
to the United States Attorney for this district. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(3).

2