Walker v. Carter County, KY et al

Filing 91

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) 89 Report and Recommendation re 76 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Southern Health Partners, Inc., Inc. is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Court; (2) Defendant Southern Health Partners Inc's Motion for S/Jmt 76 is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Southern Health Partners Inc are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Southern Health Partners, Inc. terminated as a party defendant.) Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 3/7/2011. (CMR) cc: COR w/cc mailed to David M. Walker at his last known address of Federal Transfer Center, Oklahoma City, OK. Modified on 3/8/2011 to reflect additional copy mailed to Mr. Walker at USP Atlanta. (CMR).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT ASHLAND CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-25-DLB-HAI DAVID M. WALKER PLAINTIFF vs. ORDER CARTER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, ET AL. ************** DEFENDANTS This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of the Magistrate Judge, wherein he recommends that the Court grant Defendant Southern Health Partners, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. # 89). No objections to the R&R have been filed, and the time to do so has now expired. Upon review of the R&R, and the Court being in agreement with the recommended disposition of the Motion in all respects, and being otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that, 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 89) is ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Court; 2. Defendant Southern Health Partners, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 76) is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Southern Health Partners, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice. -1- This 7th day of March, 2011. G:\DATA\ORDERS\Ashland Civil\2009\09-25- Adopt R&R.wpd -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?