Nasheed v. Sepanek

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1)Petitioner Nadir Nasheed's motions to expand the record, D.E. Nos. 8 and 9 are SUSTAINED; (2) Nasheed's motion to restore his GTC, D.E. No. 10 is OVERRULED; (3) Nasheed's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petit ion, D.E. No. 1 , as amended, [D.E. Nos. 3 and 6 is DENIED as PREMATURE; (4) Clerk shall mail a courtesy copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to USP-Big Sandy Warden, Robert Farley and to Respondent, Michael Sepanek, Warden of FCI Ashland, via certified mail, return receipt requested; (5) Court will enter an appropriate judgmnet; (6) Matter is STRICKEN from active docket. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr. on 1/28/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mailing Receipts) (CMR)cc: COR, Nadir Nasheed via U.S. Mail; Warden USP Big Sandy and Warden FCI Ashland w/cc Judgment via U.S. Mail, Certified mail, Return receipt requested

Download PDF
./ U.S. Postal Service"" CERTIFIED MAIL-,.! RECEIPT CJ ~ ;;-; (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) I"'­ .-=! IAL U .-=! CJ U1 Certified Fee rn CJ Return Receipt Fee CJ (Endorsement Required) CJ Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) CJ rn ~ ..;;;.3..::2-=-1 0: 110/ 1I 5 .3. /0 Postage f-$--::../..:..... ...D ., Postmark Here C L"'" a<. o:J .:J 1----...:........;;;...---1 1--.....,..-------1 Total Postage & Fees '-'--=~...t.-.o----J .-=! ~ CJ CJ I"'­ U.S. Postal Service TU CERTIFIED MAIL.., RECEIPT rn I"' I"'­­ .-=! .-=! CJ U1 ..D rn CJ CJ CJ (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) . .. I . . . . .. . . ., I OFFICIAL USE Postage $ Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) CJ Total Postage & Fees Postmark Here :2.S'S" Reslrlcted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) t:O 1.37­ 0: 12t!A{pS 3. to Certlfled Fee rn .-=! ~ $ IP.'11 1--)..i-I.3 ~~~~--------r~~~~--~~------~ .._.=-.. CJ ~~"~~_.~.~~~~~~;~~ .•~=:::.l ______ ~=;~ CJ ~.=.=_~I ___ ·~ I"'-ta~s~~~~'~~:~-!-"~~=~~"-';'i~~'~:"~"T""""'1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?