Odom v. McKenzie et al

Filing 75

ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ODRERED AND ADJUDGED, (1) that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation DE# 66 is hereby APPROVED and ADOPTED as and for the Court's opinion; (2) Plaintiff's Motion to Amend his Complaint to dismiss his claims against Doug Nickels DE#64 be SUSTAINED; and (3) Plaintiff's claims against Doug Nickels are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 2/28/2014.(KSS)cc: COR, Odom (via US Mail)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

NORTHERN DIVISION

ASHLAND

Civil Action No. 12-S1-HRW
PLAINTIFF,

GLENN D. ODOM, II,

v.

ORDER

SHAWN MCKENZIE, et al.,

DEFENDANTS.

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion to Amend his Complaint [Docket
No. 64] insofar as he seeks to dismiss his claims against Doug Nickels. Magistrate Judge Atkins
has issued a Report and Recommendation that Plaintiffs claims against Doug Nickels be
dismissed. After carefully considering the record, the Court finds the report and recommendation
well taken and shall adopt the same as and for its own opinion.
Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED,
(1)

that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 66] is
hereby APPROVED and ADOPTED as and for the Court's opinion;

(2)

Plaintiffs Motion to Amend his Complaint to dismiss his claims against Doug
Nickels [Docket No. 64] be SUSTAINED; and

(2)

Plaintiffs claims against Doug Nickels are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
This 28th day of February, 2014.