Hicks v. Sepanek

Filing 12

JUDGMENT: Consistent with the MO&O entered today, pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the complaint filed by Katherine Hicks against Warden M. Sepanek DE# 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the defendant. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 3/17/14.(KSS)cc: COR, Hicks (via US Mail)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

NORTHERN DIVISION

ASHLAND

KATHERINE HICKS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.

M. SEPANEK, WARDEN
Defendant.

Civil No. 0: 13-CV-91-HRW

JUDGMENT

*** *** *** ***
Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today,
pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the complaint filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1331
pursuant to the doctrine announced in Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics

Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) by Katherine Hicks against Warden M. Sepanek [D.
E. No.1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Judgment is ENTERED in
favor of the defendant.
Entered: March 17, 2014.