Johnson v. Burchett et al

Filing 25

ORDER: 1) that the Magistrate Judge's R&R is hereby approved and adopted as and for the opinion of the Court, 2) that the Motion to Dismiss DE 21 be OVERRULED, 3) that the Motions for Summary Judgment DE 22 23 be SUSTAINED; 4) the Court declines to grant a Certificate of Appealability; and 5) that this is a final and appealable order. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 1/28/19.(KSS)cc: COR, Johnson (via US Mail)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY - J'AN 2 8 2019 NORTHERN DIVISION ASHLAND Civil Action No. 18-37-HRW ERIC ANTHONY JOHNSON, v. PLAINTIFF, ORDER MILLER, et al., DEFENDANTS. This matter is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 21], Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [Docket Nos. 22 and 23]. The motions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram for Report and Recommendation. On January 9, 2019, Magistrate Judge Ingram entered his Report and Recommendation wherein he found that the Defendants' motion to dismiss should be overruled and their motions for summary judgment should be sustained. [Docket No. 24]. Hearing no objections to the report and recommendation, and seeing no error in same, this Court adopts the recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1) that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is hereby approved and adopted as and for the opinion of the Court, 2) that the Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 21] be OVERRULED, 3) that the Motions for Summary Judgment [Docket Nos. 22 and 23] be SUSTAINED; 4) the Court declines to grant a Certificate of Appealability; and 5) that this is a final and appealable order. This 28th day of January, 2019.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?