Krug v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Filing 42

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: (1) The Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation 39 is hereby adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Court; (2) the Plaintiffs Complaint 1 is hereby dismissed; and (3) a separate Judgment will be filed concurrently herewith. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 11/14/2018. (KRB)cc: COR, Gregory C. Krug via US Mail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
NORTHERN DIVISION
AT COVINGTON
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1-DLB-EBA
GREGORY C. KRUG

v.

PLAINTIFF

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
* *

* *

DEFENDANT
* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

* *

This matter is before the Court upon the February 2, 2018 Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins (Doc. #
39), wherein he recommends that Plaintiff’s pro se Complaint seeking a tax refund (Doc.
# 1) be dismissed without prejudice for failure to respond to the Court’s orders. Plaintiff
was placed on notice that failure to provide written notice of a change of address may
result in dismissal of the case. (Doc. # 26). Yet, Plaintiff has consistently failed to keep
the Court apprised of his current address. (See Docs. # 23, 25, 36, 38, 40, 41).
No objections having been filed, and the time to do so having now expired, the
R&R is ripe for the Court’s consideration. The Court having reviewed the R&R, and
concluding that it is sound in all respects, and being otherwise sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED as follows:
(1)

The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 39) is hereby

adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Court;
(2)

the Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. # 1) is hereby dismissed; and

1

(3)

a separate Judgment will be filed concurrently herewith.

This 14th day of November, 2018.

J:\DATA\ORDERS\ProSe\16-1 Order Adopting R&R.docx

2