Carey v. Wolnitzek et al

Filing 131

ORDER: 1) Carey's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal 126 , which was premised upon the fact that Bauer was pending before the Supreme Court, is DENIED as moot; and 2) this matter is set for a telephonic scheduling conference on September 7, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. Chambers will initiate the call. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 8/29/2011.(CBD)cc: COR, Lex Diary

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at FRANKFORT CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-cv-36-KKC MARCUS CAREY, v. PLAINTIFF, OPINION AND ORDER STEPHEN D. WOLNITZEK, et al., DEFENDANTS ********** This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Voluntary Dismissal [DE 126] filed by the Plaintiff, Marcus Carey. In his motion, Carey seeks to voluntarily dismiss his one unresolved claim in this case: a claim that Canon 5(B)(1)(c)) (the “Commits Clause”) of the Kentucky Code of Judicial Conduct is unconstitutional on its face. Carey asks that his challenge to the Commits Clause be dismissed given the possibility that the Supreme Court may grant certiorari in Bauer v. Shepard, No. 10-425, and that any resulting decision in that case may finally resolve the constitutionality of the Commits Clause. This Court previously stayed the deadlines for filing answers or responsive pleadings to Carey’s amended complaint challenging the constitutionality of the Commits Clause pending resolution of Bauer. The Court further ordered that, upon resolution of that case, the Court would set a telephonic conference to discuss scheduling in this matter. [DE 123]. Carey has now filed a Notice with the Court stating that the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Bauer. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1) Carey’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal [DE 126], which was premised upon the fact that Bauer was pending before the Supreme Court, is DENIED as moot; and 2) this matter is set for a telephonic scheduling conference on September 7, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. Chambers will initiate the call. Dated this 29th day of August, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?