Bowling et al v. Haas et al

Filing 53

JUDGMENT: The Complaint filed under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801-971, and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301-399a, by plaintiffs Thomas Clyde Bowling and Ralph Baze against Defendants Scott Haas; John D. Rees; Thomas Simpson; and Unknown Executioners 5 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendants. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 9/23/2010.(CBD)cc: COR

Bowling et al v. Haas et al

Doc. 53

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A ST E R N DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY C E N T R A L DIVISION at FRANKFORT T H O M A S CLYDE BOWLING, and RALPH BAZE, Plaintiffs, v. SC O T T HAAS, et al., D efe ndants. | | | | | | | | | |

C ivil Action No. 3: 07-032-KKC

JU D G M EN T

**** **** **** C onsistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. T he Complaint filed under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801-971, and the

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301-399a, by plaintiffs Thomas Clyde Bowling and Ralph B aze against Defendants Scott Haas; John D. Rees; Thomas Simpson; and Unknown Executioners [R. 5] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendants. T his the 23rd day of September, 2010.

Dockets.Justia.com