Warford v. SSA

Filing 18

ORDER: (1) the Plaintiff's Motion 15 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED only in so far as it seeks a determination that the Commissioners decision is not fully supported by substantial evidence; (2) the Defendant's Motion 16 for Summary J udgment is DENIED only in so far as it seeks a determination that the Commissioners decision was fully supported by substantial evidence; (3) all other pending motions, if any, are MOOT; and (4) the administrative decision will accordingly be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative consideration by separate Judgment entered this same date. Signed by Judge G. Wix Unthank on 8/11/2010. (CBD)cc: COR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at FRANKFORT

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-52-GWU LEANN H. WARFORD, VS. ORDER PLAINTIFF,

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

DEFENDANT.

************* In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion simultaneously entered in the above-styled action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED only in so

far as it seeks a determination that the Commissioner's decision is not fully supported by substantial evidence; (2) the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED only in so

far as it seeks a determination that the Commissioner's decision was fully supported by substantial evidence; (3) (4) all other pending motions, if any, are MOOT; and the administrative decision will accordingly be REVERSED and

REMANDED for further administrative consideration by separate Judgment entered this same date. This the 11th day of August, 2010.