Vaughan v. Ky Army National Guard et al

Filing 38

JUDGMENT: (1) All claims asserted by Plaintiff Michael Dean Vaughan regarding the AR 15-6 Report, the letter of reprimand, and the Officer Evaluation Report are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants Kentucky Arm y National Guard and United States Department of the Army with respect to these claims. (2) All remaining claims asserted in this action by Plaintiff Michael Dean Vaughan are DISMISSED, without prejudice. (3) This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Courts docket. (4) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/18/2013.(CBD)cc: COR, Michael D. Vaughan via US Mail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION
(at Frankfort)
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN,
Plaintiff,
V.
KENTUCKY ARMY NATIONAL
GUARD and UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 3: 12-0035-DCR

JUDGMENT

*** *** *** ***
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, and pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
(1)

All claims asserted by Plaintiff Michael Dean Vaughan regarding the AR 15-6

Report, the letter of reprimand, and the Officer Evaluation Report are DISMISSED, with
prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants Kentucky Army National Guard and
United States Department of the Army with respect to these claims.
(2)

All remaining claims asserted in this action by Plaintiff Michael Dean Vaughan

are DISMISSED, without prejudice.
(3)

This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court’s docket.

(4)

This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for

delay.
-1-

This 18th day of January, 2013.

-2-