Wilson v. Carroll County et al

Filing 42

JUDGMENT: (1) Defendant Johnson's Motion for Summary Judgment 23 is GRANTED for Counts Two, Four, and Five; (2) Defendant Johnson's Motion for Summary Judgment 23 is DENIED for Count One; (3) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE ORDER and there is no just cause for delay; and (4) The Carroll County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 29 is GRANTED for all claims asserted against Carroll County Detention Center, Carroll County, and Michael Humphrey in both his official cap acity as Carroll County Jailer and in his individual capacity; and (5) Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Carroll County, Carroll County Detention Center, and Michael Humphrey, in both his official capacity as Carroll County Jailer and in his individual capacity; and the claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 3/6/2014.(CBD)cc: COR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION
FRANKFORT

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
V.
)
)
CARROLL COUNTY,
)
)
CARROLL COUNTY DETENTION
)
CENTER,
)
)
MICHAEL HUMPHREY, Individually,
)
and in his Official Capacity as Carroll
)
County Jailer,
)
)
JENNIFER JOHNSON, Individually, and )
)
UNNAMED CARROLL COUNTY
)
DETENTION CENTER MEDICAL
)
DIRECTOR,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
JACK A. WILSON

***

***

Civil No: 12-68-GFVT

JUDGMENT

***

***

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinions and Orders entered
contemporaneously herewith, and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
(1)

Defendant Johnson’s Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 23] is

GRANTED for Counts Two, Four, and Five;
(2)

Defendant Johnson’s Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 23] is DENIED

for Count One;
(3)

This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE ORDER and there is no just cause

for delay; and
(4)

The Carroll County Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 29] is

GRANTED for all claims asserted against Carroll County Detention Center, Carroll
County, and Michael Humphrey in both his official capacity as Carroll County Jailer and
in his individual capacity; and
(5)

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Carroll County,

Carroll County Detention Center, and Michael Humphrey, in both his official
capacity as Carroll County Jailer and in his individual capacity; and the claims against
them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
This 6th day of March, 2014.

2