Hopper v. Trimble County Police

Filing 7

ORDER: Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/10/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af) [Transferred from tnmd on 10/10/2013.]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION TERRY W. HOPPER Petitioner, v. TRIMBLE COUNTY POLICE Respondent. ] ] ] ] ] ] No. (No. 3:13-mc-0088) Judge Campbell O R D E R Presently before the Court are petitioner’s pro se habeas corpus petition (Docket Entry No.1) and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No.5). The petitioner is an inmate at the Sumner County Jail in Gallatin, Tennessee. It appears from his application that he lacks sufficient financial resources from which to pay the fee needed to file the habeas corpus petition. Therefore, petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Although the petitioner is incarcerated in this judicial district, his petition questions the legality of a detainer entered against him by the Kentucky State Police quartered in Trimble County, Kentucky. A federal district court has the discretion to transfer a habeas corpus petition to a more convenient forum. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Because the petitioner is challenging an out of state detainer rather than his present confinement, this Court is not the most convenient forum for the adjudication of his claims. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. 28 U.S.C. § 97(a); See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky, 410 U.S. 484,493-94 (1973). It is so ORDERED. ____________________________ Todd Campbell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?