Hyatt v. Lee Adjustment Center Medical Department et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER, ORDERED: (1) plf's complaint is DISMISSED w/o prejudice (2) the court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood. (LKM)cc: COR
Hyatt v. Lee Adjustment Center Medical Department et al
Page 1 of 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-CV-91-JMH DONALD HYATT V.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEE ADJUSTMENT CENTER MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and GLEN JONES
Donald Hyatt ("Hyatt") , a prisoner incarcerated at the Lee Adjustment Center ("LAC"), filed this p r o se 42 U.S.C. S1983 The Court has granted
complaint on April 2, 2007 [Record No. 21.
Hyatt' s application to proceed i n forma p a u p e r i s by separate Order. The Court screens civil rights complaints pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S1915A. McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 607-08 (6th Cir. 1997). As Hyatt is appearing p r o se, his complaint is held to less stringent standards than those drafted by attorneys.
v. Jones, 321 F.3d 569, 573 (6th Cir. 2003); Hahn v. S t a r Bank, 190
F.3d 708, 715 (6th Cir. 1999). During screening, the allegations
in his complaint are taken as true and liberally construed in his favor.
U r b i n a v. Thorns, 270 F.3d 292, 295 (6th Cir. 2001).
the Court must dismiss a case at any time if it determines the action (i) is frivolous or malicious, or (ii) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2).
Page 2 of 6
On November 6, 2006, Hyatt, a diabetic, went to the LAC medical department to test his blood sugar levels. As nurse Glen
Jones was already assisting another inmate with testing his blood sugar levels, Hyatt waited for him to finish. Once the other
inmate had departed, Hyatt reached down to the table for a new lancet to prick his finger for the blood sample. Hyatt alleges
that upon doing so he pricked his left hand on the lancet used by the other prisoner, which had been left on the table. When Hyatt
informed Jones that he had been stuck by the used needle, Jones told him that he could get his blood tested by submitting a sick call slip. Hyatt demanded that Jones complete an incident report
regarding these events, but Jones refused. A subsequent blood test did not show any signs of infection or transmitted disease, but the results of a second set of blood tests have been lost. On November 7, 2006, Hyatt regarding the grievance on incident. November filed an a Informal Grievance resolution of that Hyatt indicated was
LAC proposed 22,
unsatisfactory on November 28, 2006. review of his grievance.
Hyatt then sought formal
On January 5, 2007, the Health Care
Grievance Committee sent Hyatt a letter setting forth its findings and recommendations. The Committee indicated its agreement with
the Informal Resolution, noting that in response to questions from the Committee, Jones stated that Hyatt picked up a new, rather than used, lancet, and that his examination of Hyatt's finger did not -2-
Page 3 of 6
reveal either a puncture wound or blood. advised Hyatt that
The Committee's letter
you decide to appeal this decision,
you will need to address this matter with the Institutional Grievance Coordinator."
42 U.S.C. S1997e (a) requires a prisoner challenging prison conditions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 51983, Bivens, or other federal law to exhaust all available administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court.
Porter v. Nussle, 534 U . S .
516, 532 (2002); It is the his
Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 877-78 (6th Cir. 1999).
prisoner who must demonstrate that he has
administrative remedies. Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1104 (6th Cir. 1998).
Kentucky's prison system is set forth in the Kentucky Department of Corrections' Corrections Policies and Procedures ("CPP") 14.6.
Grievances related to health care at the prison are processed separately from other grievances pursuant to a procedure set forth at CPP 14.6 (11)(K). grievance process. First, the prisoner files the grievance within five days of the incident, which is reviewed and addressed by the Chief Medical Authority at the prison. If the prisoner is not satisfied with the That subsection establishes a three-step
Page 4 of 6
response, he may file an appeal within five days by requesting review from the Health Care Grievance Committee.
Second, the Health Care Grievance Committee, composed of three health care professionals, review the prisoner's grievance and If the
makes its findings and recommendations within 15 days. prisoner disagrees with the Committee's
recommendation, he may
appeal the decision for final review by filing an appeal with the grievance coordinator at the prison within three days.
(11)(K)( 2 ) .
Third, the Department of Corrections Medical Director's Office reviews the prisoner's within 20 days. appeal and makes a final determination
CPP 14.6 (11)(K)(3). This three-step process is
evident to the prisoner from the front page of the form KDOC provides to prisoners for grievances, providing a due date for each of the three steps in the review process. initiate this grievance. Hyatt attached to his complaint documents evidencing his participation in the first two steps of the grievance process. Those documents show his attempt at informal resolution, his rejection of the proposed resolution, and the Health Care Grievance Committee's recommendation that his grievance be denied [Record No.
Hyatt used this form to
Because these documents did not show Hyatt's completion of the
third step in the appeal process, the Court entered an Order
Page 5 of 6
requesting either copies of the documents related to the third step in the process or, if appropriate, an explanation from Hyatt for his failure to file an appeal to KDOC's Medical Director's Office [Record No. 61. In his response [Record No. 71, Hyatt asserts that the
documents attached to his original complaint establish that he has exhausted his administrative remedies. Hyatt's response also makes clear that the documents he submitted with this complaint fully document his efforts to exhaust his administrative remedies.
Because those documents show completion of only two steps in the administrative grievance process, Hyatt's complaint and its
supporting attachments establish that he failed to complete the three-step grievance process. Having failed to complete the
grievance process set forth at CPP 14.6 (11)(K) Hyatt has not , exhausted his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. S1997e (a). prejudice. Accordingly, his complaint must be dismissed without
Porter v. N u s s l e , 534 U.S. 516, 532 (2002).
The Court being follows :
sufficiently advised, it
is ORDERED as
(1) Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice.
(2) The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) (3); M c G o r e v. W r i g g l e s w o r t h , 114
F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); K i n c a d e v. S p a r k m a n , 117 F.3d 949
Page 6 of 6
(6th Cir. 1997).
T h i s the 20th day of April, 2 0 0 7 .
p Lrl b , m . .o B
Hood, Chief Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?