Love v. Growse et al

Filing 9

JUDGMENT: (1)Pla Martay Love filed complaint asserting civil rights claim under 28 USC 1331 against Dfts Dr. Growse, Dr. Holbrook, Mr. Cox, Nurse Carpenter; (2)Complain DE 2 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3)Judgment is entered in favor of dfts; (4)t his is FINAL & APPEALABLE Judgment & there is no just cause for delay; (5)Court certifies any appeal would not be taken in good faith; (6)matter is DISMISSED & STRICKEN from Court's docket.. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 10/03/2008.(RJD)cc: COR

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A ST E RN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY C E NT R AL DIVISION at LEXINGTON MARTAY LOVE P lai n tiff V. DR. GROWSE, ET AL. D efendan ts ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 5: 08-303-KSF JU D G M E N T **** **** **** In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Martay Love has filed a Complaint asserting civil rights claims under 28 U.S.C. 1331, pursuant to the doctrine announced in Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Defendants Dr. Growse; Dr. Holbrook; Nurse Carpenter; and Mr. Cox. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Complaint [DE 2] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997). 6. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. This 3rd day of October, 2008. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?