Love v. Growse et al

Filing 9

JUDGMENT: (1)Pla Martay Love filed complaint asserting civil rights claim under 28 USC 1331 against Dfts Dr. Growse, Dr. Holbrook, Mr. Cox, Nurse Carpenter; (2)Complain DE 2 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3)Judgment is entered in favor of dfts; (4)t his is FINAL & APPEALABLE Judgment & there is no just cause for delay; (5)Court certifies any appeal would not be taken in good faith; (6)matter is DISMISSED & STRICKEN from Court's docket.. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 10/03/2008.(RJD)cc: COR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A ST E RN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY C E NT R AL DIVISION at LEXINGTON

MARTAY LOVE P lai n tiff V. DR. GROWSE, ET AL. D efendan ts

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 5: 08-303-KSF

JU D G M E N T

**** **** ****

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Martay Love has filed a Complaint asserting civil rights claims under 28

U.S.C. § 1331, pursuant to the doctrine announced in Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Defendants Dr. Growse; Dr. Holbrook; Nurse Carpenter; and Mr. Cox. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Complaint [DE 2] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(3); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997).

6.

This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket.

This 3rd day of October, 2008.

-2-