LM Insurance Corporation et al v. Canal Insurance Company

Filing 37

OPINION & ORDER: 1) Plas' 33 and 34 Motions for Judgment are GRANTED to the extent that judgment in the amt of $421,925.51, plus prejudgment interest in the amt of $48,554.90 for a total of $470,480.41, but DENIED as premature with respect to the requested costs. 2) Pla's Bill of Costs is REFERRED to the Clerk pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Fed Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 4/19/2012.(SCD)cc: COR

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-81-KSF LM INSURANCE CORPORATION and LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PLAINTIFFS OPINION & ORDER CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT ******** Currently before the Court are the motions of the Plaintiffs, LM Insurance Corporation and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, for judgment in accordance with this Court’s Opinion & Order entered on March 22, 2012 [DE #33, 34]. In conjunction with these motions, the Plaintiffs have also submitted a proposed Amended Judgment in the amount of $421,925.51, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $48,554.90, plus its taxable costs in the amount of $364.50. Also pending before the Clerk is the Plaintiffs’ Bill of Costs in the amount of $364.50 [DE #35]. In accordance with its Opinion & Order of March 22, 2012, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) the Plaintiffs’ motions for judgment [DE #33,34] are GRANTED to the extent that judgment in the amount of $421,925.51, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $48,554.90, for a total of $470,480.41, but DENIED as premature with respect to the requested costs; and (2) the Plaintiffs’ Bill of Costs is REFERRED to the Clerk of Court pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This April 19, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?