Hall v. SSA
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Amend or Correct, 23 , is DENIED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 06/18/2015.(LC)cc: COR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON
HOLLY SUE HALL,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
Civil Case No.
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for
Relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). [DE 23]. Plaintiff requests
payable to Plaintiff because the Plaintiff signed an EAJA fee
assignment after the Court’s entry of an EAJA award.
Plaintiff’s motion is out of time and should be denied and,
nonetheless, asserts that the agency decided to waive the antiassignment
Plaintiff’s attorney. Plaintiff has not replied, although the
time to do so has passed, from which the Court concludes that
Plaintiff has no objection to this assertion.
Regardless, Plaintiff brings her motion under Rule 59(e) but
filed it outside of the 28-day deadline imposed by that rule.
Thus, Plaintiff’s motion is untimely.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend
or Correct, [DE 23], is DENIED.
This the 18th day of June, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?