Kentucky Forward LLC v. Short et al

Filing 45

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default 44 is GRANTED; (2) Clerk shall strike the Answer 15 from the record; (3) Clerk shall enter a default against Defendant Paige Shumate Short; (4) at least two weeks bef ore the hearing on damages, counsel and pro se litigant shall: (a) file a list of exhibits; (b) premark and display to opposing counsel or pro se litigant all exhibits intended to be used at the hearing; (c) file a witness list; (d) file a pre-hearin g memorandum brief; (5) at least one week before the hearing on damages, counsel or pro se litigant shall raise any objections or make any motions related to the evidence to be presented at the hearing on damages; and (6) HEARING ON DAMAGES set for 7/5/2016 at 1:00 PM in LEXINGTON before Judge Joseph M. Hood. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 5/19/2016.(STC)cc: COR,D,P. Short Modified on 5/19/2016 (STC).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON KENTUCKY FORWARD LLC, Plaintiff, v. PAIGE SHUMATE SHORT, et al., Defendants. ** ** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Action No. 5:15-CV-6-JMH MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ** ** ** This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Paige Shumate Short [DE 41]. The Court has already directed the Clerk to enter a default against Defendant Four Tigers, LLC, [DE 34 and 35] for its failure to obtain counsel. Counterclaim The against Court also Plaintiff dismissed for lack Defendant of subject Short’s matter jurisdiction [DE 33]. On November 13, 2015, the Court ordered Defendant Short to provide Rule-compliant responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions by November 23, 2015, or have the Requests deemed admitted Defendant [DE 36]. Short Interrogatories to and On November respond Requests December 1, 2015, [DE 38]. to for 17, 2015, the majority Production the Court of of ordered Plaintiff’s Documents by Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order [DE 22], discovery in this matter closed on December 8, 2015, although the Court ultimately extended discovery until January 4, 2016, [DE 40]. Defendant Short did not respond to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents, nor did she serve Rule-compliant responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for Admission [Pl.’s Mem. Supp. Mot. Default J., p.2, DE 41]. Defendant Short did not contest Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, which was filed over three months ago. To the Court’s knowledge, Defendant Short has not participated in defending this lawsuit since serving her insufficient Responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions on August 24, 2015. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(vi) permits a court to render a default judgment against a party who disobeys a court order. A “dismissal is an appropriate sanction where the party's failure to cooperate with the court's discovery orders is due to willfulness. A willful violation occurs whenever there is a conscious and intentional failure to comply with the court order.” Jostens, Inc., 71 F.3d 237, 241 (6th Cir. 1995). Bass v. In this case, the Court provided Defendant Short with additional time to answer and expressed its concern over levying sanctions such as attorney’s fees against a pro se Defendant without providing the Defendant the opportunity to remedy her discovery failure [Order, p. 2, DE 38]. At this juncture, Defendant Short has had approximately six months since that Order to respond to the discovery as required, 2    move the Court for some form of relief, or otherwise defend this lawsuit. what Defendant Short’s inaction since August 2015 evidences the Court can only conclude is a willful refusal to participate in this lawsuit and intentional failure to comply with the Court’s orders. fail to comply with “A district court may sanction parties who discovery orders in a variety of ways, including dismissal of their lawsuit or entry of default judgment against them.” Bank One of Cleveland, N.A. v. Abbe, 916 F.2d 1067, 1073 (6th Cir. 1990) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(vi)the Court finds that Defendant Short has failed to obey the Court’s orders, and failed to respond to the instant motion, despite ample time to do so, and, therefore, a default judgment is appropriate at this time. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: (1) that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default [DE 44] is GRANTED; (2) that the Clerk shall strike the Answer [DE 15] from the record; (3) that the Clerk shall enter a default against Defendant Paige Shumate Short; (4) that, at least two weeks before the hearing on damages, counsel and pro se litigant shall: (a) file a list of exhibits intended to be used at the hearing; 3    (b) premark and display to opposing counsel or pro se litigant all exhibits intended to be used at the hearing; (c) file a witness list with a brief summary of the expected testimony of each witness; (d) file a pre-hearing memorandum brief containing a succinct statement of facts and law as related to the damages sought in this case; (5) that, at least one week before the hearing on damages, counsel or pro se litigant shall raise any objections or make any motions related to the evidence to be presented at the hearing on damages; and (6) that this matter is set for a hearing on the issue of damages on July 5, 2016, at the hour of 1:00 p.m., pending further orders of the Court. This the 19th day of May, 2016. 4   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?