Miles v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. Clerk is directed to issue summons to Don Bottom, Warden, at address listed in order, to respond to pla's 1 complaint; 2. Clerk shall prepare a "Service Packet" as indicated in this ord er; 3. Clerk shall deliver Service Packet to USMS; note date of delivery; 4. USMS shall personally serve Service Packet upon Don Bottom; 5. Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this Order on the Kentucky Department of Corrections, & note serv ice date in the docket sheet; 6. Miles must immediately advise Clerk's Office of any change in current mailing address; Failure may result in dismissal of case; 7. For every further pleading or other document, pla shall serve upon each defendan t, or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon each atty, a copy of the pleading or other document; pla shall send the original papers to be filed w/ the Clerk together w/ certificate stating date a true & correct copy of document was mailed to each dft or counsel. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on May 14, 2015. (MWZ) cc: COR (Pla via U.S. Mail, USMS w/ Service Packet, Copy of Order to KY Dept. of Corrections via U.S. Mail
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION
LEXINGTON
DARRELL L. MILES,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
V.
DON BOTTOM, Warden, et al.,
Defendants.
****
Civil No. 5:15-CV-126-JMH
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND ORDER
****
****
****
Darrell L. Miles is in custody of the Kentucky Department
of
Corrections
Northpoint
(“KDOC”)
Training
and
Center
is
presently
(“NTC”)
in
confined
Burgin,
in
the
Kentucky.
Proceeding pro se, Miles has filed a complaint, although not
styled as such,1 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the KDOC;
LaDonna Thompson, Commissioner, KDOC; Don Bottom, Warden at NTC,
and nine other prison officials at NTC, claiming that these
prison
officials
have
violated
his
constitutional
rights
by
being deliberately indifferent to his safety and security needs,
1
In lieu of filing a complaint, Miles filed a motion for a
preliminary injunction, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65. For
administrative purposes, the Clerk of the Court has docketed
this matter as prisoner civil rights action filed under 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,
by violating his rights to equal protection, and by retaliating
against him for filing grievances and requests to be placed in
the
Special
Management
Unit
(“SMU”)
to
protect
himself
from
further harm allegedly being inflicted upon him by other inmates
at NTC. [R. 1] At this juncture, the Court construes Miles’s
motion
for
pursuant
to
a
42
preliminary
U.S.C.
§
injunction
1983,
that
as
a
seeks
complaint
injunctive
filed
relief
against the named defendants.
The Court screens civil rights complaints pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A.
McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 607-08
(6th Cir. 1997).
This is a pro se complaint and, as such, it is
held
to
less
attorneys.
Kerner,
404
stringent
standards
than
those
drafted
by
See Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319 (1972); Haines v.
U.S.
519
(1972).
The
allegations
in
a
pro
se
complaint must be taken as true and construed in favor of the
plaintiff.
1983).
See Malone v. Colyer, 710 F.2d 258, 260 (6th Cir.
Under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), a district court has
authority to dismiss a case at any time if it determines either
that the action is frivolous or malicious, or if it fails to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
NAMED DEFENDANTS
2
The
named
defendants
are:
(1)
Kentucky
Department
of
Corrections (“KDOC”), (2) LaDonna Thompson, Commissioner, KDOC,
(3)
Don
Bottom,
Warden,
NTC,
(4)
Brad
Adams,
Admin.
Sect.
Supervisor, NTC, (5) Rick Rowlette, Deputy Warden, NTC, (6) Gary
Prestigiacomo,
Correctional
Deputy
Officer,
Warden,
NTC,
NTC,
Earl
(8)
(7)
Craig
Walls,
Hughes,
Correctional
Officer, NTC, (9) Mendalyn Cochran, Correctional Officer, NTC
(10)
Jack
Godbey,
Correctional
Officer,
NTC,
(11)
Stephanie
Hughes, Correctional Officer, NTC, (12) Lt. Crane, NTC, and (13)
Bridgett Gillihand, Sr. Captain, NTC.
CLAIMS ASSERTED
Miles
claims
that
NTC
prison
officials
have
failed
to
protect him from being assaulted with human feces on more than
one occasion by other inmates while he is sleeping1 and that they
have been deliberately indifferent to his safety needs and the
risks
to
his
health
by
these
recurring
assaults,
all
in
violation of his rights under the Eighth Amendment of the United
States Constitution and that they have retaliated against him
for filing grievances concerning this matter and seeking to be
placed
in
protective
custody
to
prevent
further
harm
from
1
Elaborating, Miles explains that while he is sleeping, other
inmates, using a straw or other instrument, place feces in the
back of his mouth as far as possible, then they intentionally
touch him on the rectum to awaken him, and that upon being
awakened, he ingests the feces by swallowing it. [R. 1, p. 2]
3
additional exposure to human feces.
Miles claims that as the
result of past assaults with human waste, he has had to seek
medical
treatment
for
bacterial
infections
caused
by
such
exposure and ingestion of human waste.2
Miles states that in March of 2015, he removed himself from
being susceptible to these human feces assaults by requesting to
be placed in Protective Custody (“PC”), and that he was placed
in PC for a period of time.
However, he also states that on
March 27, 2015, NTC prison officials Stephanie Hughes and Deputy
Warden Prestigiacomo removed him from PC and told him he could
no longer hide in the Special Management Unit.
[R. 1, p. 3]
As evidenced by Exhibit “D” to his complaint, Miles alerted
NTC Warden Don Bottom to this problem in October of 2014.
[R.
1-4] Further, as evidenced by Exhibit “C” to the complaint,
Miles
has
brought
this
matter
to
NTC
Deputy
Warden
Gary
Prestigiacomo’s attention on more than one occasion, all to no
avail, he claims.
Miles also alleges that NTC prison officials
have retaliated against him for seeking protection from these
human feces assaults by placing him back in the same prison dorm
setting where the prior assaults occurred.
He requests either
to be placed in a two-man cell so that he would not be sleeping
2
Miles states that currently has a helicobacter pylori bacterial
infection and seeks treatment for it.
4
in a room with a group of inmates, or to be transferred to
another correctional institution, as he claims was recommended
by the Classification Committee.
Given
the
seriousness
of
Miles’s
allegations
and
the
potential health risks associated with the exposure to human
waste
products,
the
Court
concludes
that
at
this
juncture,
without further delay, summons should issue to the Warden at
Northpoint Training Center to respond to plaintiff’s complaint.
Accordingly, IT IS SO ORDERED:
1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue summons to Don
Bottom,
Warden,
Northpoint
Training
Center,
Highway
33,
Box
479, Burgin, KY 40310, to respond to plaintiff’s complaint.
[R. 1].
2.
The Clerk shall prepare a “Service Packet” for the
defendant, which shall include:
a.
b.
the complaint [R. 1];
c.
this Order; and
d.
3.
a completed summons form;
a completed USM Form 285.
The Clerk shall deliver the Service Packet to the USMS
and note the date of delivery in the docket.
4.
The USMS shall, through arrangement with Northpoint
Training Center, personally serve the Service Packet upon Don
5
Bottom, Warden, Northpoint Training Center, Highway 33, Box 479,
Burgin, KY 40310.
5.
The Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this
Order on the Kentucky Department of Corrections, and to note the
service date in the docket sheet.
6.
Miles must immediately advise the Clerk’s Office of
any change in his current mailing address.
Failure to do so may
result in dismissal of this case.
7.
For every further pleading or other document he wishes
to submit to the Court for consideration, the plaintiff shall
serve upon each defendant, or, if appearance has been entered by
counsel, upon each attorney, a copy of the pleading or other
document.
The plaintiff shall send the original papers to be
filed with the Clerk of the Court together with a certificate
stating the date a true and correct copy of the document was
mailed to each defendant or counsel.
This the 14th day of May, 2015.
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?