Hall v. University of Kentucky Hospital et al
Filing
22
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant University of Kentucky Hospital's 12 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 05/11/2016.(LC)cc: COR, Hall via US Mail Modified text on 5/11/2016 (LC).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION -- LEXINGTON
DANNY O. HALL,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-cv-349-KKC
Plaintiff,
V.
OPINION & ORDER
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
HOSPITAL, et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Danny Hall, who is currently incarcerated at USP Canaan, Waymart,
Pennsylvania, has filed a pro se civil complaint alleging state law medical malpractice
claims. (DE 1.) The University of Kentucky Hospital (“UK Hospital”) filed a motion to
dismiss for failure to state a claim on January 29, 2016. (DE 12.) With its motion, UK
Hospital represents that it is “an arm of the University of the Kentucky, which is an arm of
the Commonwealth of Kentucky[,]”and thus, it is immune from suit under the Eleventh
Amendment. (DE 12-1 at 2.) Because this Court agrees, UK Hospital’s motion will be
granted.
The Eleventh Amendment provides that:
The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed
to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted
against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or
by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.
U.S. Const. amend. XI. “The Supreme Court has held that the Eleventh Amendment
prohibits federal courts form entertaining suits by private parties against the states.”
Stigall v. Univ. of Kentucky Hosp., 2009 WL 3739385, at *2 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 6, 2009) (citing
Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 167 n. 14 (1985)). The Eleventh Amendment's grant of
immunity “is far-reaching and bars all suits, whether for injunctive, declaratory or
monetary relief, against the state and its departments, by citizens of another state,
foreigners, or its own citizens.” Lanier v. Kentucky Com'n on Human Rights, 2007 WL
2407274, at *2 (W.D. Ky. Aug. 20, 2007). Kentucky’s public universities are state agencies
and are protected under the Eleventh Amendment. Jackson v. Murray States Univ., 834
F.Supp.2d 609, 613 (W.D. Ky. 2011); see Hutsell v. Sayre, 5 F.3d 996, 999 (6th Cir. 1993)
(holding that the University of Kentucky is an “arm of the state under state law . . . .”). This
immunity extends to those arms of the University that perform functions integral to its
statutory mandate. See KRS § 164.125(1)(c) (“The University of Kentucky shall provide . . .
doctoral and post-doctoral programs and professional instruction including law, medicine,
dentistry, education, architecture, engineering, and social professions.”). UK Hospital
performs just such an integral function and, thus, it is entitled to sovereign immunity. See
Withers v. Univ. of Kentucky, 939 S.W.2d 340, 342–45 (Ky. 1997) (holding sovereign
immunity applicable to University of Kentucky Medical Center).
An individual may successfully sue a state for monetary relief under two
circumstances. College Sav. Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Educ. Expense Bd., 527
U.S. 666, 670 (1999). First, Congress may authorize suit under its power to enforce the
Fourteenth Amendment, and second, a state may waive its sovereign immunity by
consenting to suit. Id. Hall has provided no indication that either exception applies. (DE
18.)
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant University of Kentucky Hospital’s
motion to dismiss (DE 12) is GRANTED.
Dated May 11, 2016.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?