Hall v. University of Kentucky Hospital et al

Filing 28

OPINION ORDER: that this mater is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE & STRICKEN from the court's docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 6/22/16.(KJR)cc: COR, Hall (US Mail)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON DANNY O. HALL, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-cv-349-KKC Plaintiff, V. OPINION & ORDER UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, et al., Defendants. *** *** *** Plaintiff Danny Hall, who is currently incarcerated at USP Canaan, Waymart, Pennsylvania, filed a pro se civil complaint alleging state law medical malpractice claims. (DE 1.) On December 15, 2015, this Court granted Danny Hall’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (DE 5.) Because Hall was granted pauper status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the Lexington Clerk’s Office was directed to issue summons for the named defendants, and the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”) for the Eastern District of Kentucky was directed to serve the named defendants with the summons and complaint on Hall’s behalf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Plaintiff has received two extensions to provide an address to serve Defendant Dr. Charles Campbell after an initially unsuccessful attempt to serve him. (DE 15; DE 17.) The Clerk of Court received an address from Plaintiff on April 28, 2016, and a service packet was issued the same day. (DE 20–21.) Service has since been returned unexecuted. (DE 25.) The April 25, 2016, deadline established by this Court’s last order granting an extension has elapsed without Plaintiff providing a current address for Defendant Dr. Charles Campbell. (DE 17.) Furthermore, the only Defendant that was properly served, University of Kentucky Hospital, has been dismissed from this action. (DE 22.) Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and STRICKEN from the Court’s active docket. Dated June 22, 2016. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?