Storm v. Roscoe Medical, Inc.

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The Court's May 23, 2016 5 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on May 27, 2016. (AWD) cc: COR

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON DANIEL STORM, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ROSCOE MEDICAL, INC., Defendant. Civil Case No. 16-cv-147JMH MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER *** Defendant Roscoe Medical, Inc. (“Roscoe”) has responded to the Court’s Order requiring it to show cause why this matter should not be remanded to the Fayette Circuit Court in the absence of competent proof of an amount in controversy which exceeds $75,000 and, thus, the lack of any basis for an exercise of jurisdiction by this Court. In its Response, Roscoe points to Plaintiff’s response to Roscoe’s Request for Admission in which Plaintiff admits that he seeks damages which “exceed[] the sum of $75,000.00, exclusive of interests and costs.” at 1, Page ID#: 37.] [DE 8-1 The response to the Request for Admission is dated May 26, 2016 – three days after the Court’s Order requiring Defendant to show cause and thirteen days after the Notice of Removal. Request for Nonetheless, the Court accepts that the Admission demonstrates that the amount in controversy requirement was met at the time of removal on May 13, 2016. Thus, this Court’s exercise of jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and 1441 because this case could have been brought in federal court originally as the parties have diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy is greater than $75,000. Accordingly, the Court’s May 26, 2016, Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. This the 27th day of May, 2016. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?