Bailey v. Aramark Corporation et al

Filing 63

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That judgment is entered in favor of Defendants; 2. that this action is DISMISSED AND STRICKEN FROM THE ACTIVE DOCKET; 3. that all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; 4. that all scheduled proceedings and deadlines are CONTINUED GENERALLY; 5. That is Order is FINAL AND APPEALABLE and THERE IS NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 6/6/2018.(KM)cc: COR, Pltf via U.S. mail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON

DAVID WAYNE BAILEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARAMARK CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants .

**

**

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

**

Civil Action No.
16-CV-343-JMH-REW

JUDGMENT

**

**

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and entered today
and the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order [DE 41], dated
September 1, 2017, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
(1)

That judgment is entered in favor of Defendants;

(2)

That this action is DISMISSED AND STRICKEN FROM THE

ACTIVE DOCKET;
(3)

That all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT;

(4)

That

all

scheduled

proceedings

and

deadlines

are

CONTINUED GENERALLY; and
(5)

That this Order is FINAL AND APPEALABLE and THERE IS

NO JUST CAUSE FOR DELAY.
This is the 6th day of June, 2018.

2