Nichols et al v. Cantrell's 1st Stop, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER & OPINION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant Cintas Corporation No 2's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/14/2017. (KM)cc: COR, Atty Hill via U.S. mail. Modified text on 11/14/2017 (KM).

Eastern District of Kentun~
~ILED V4J
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DIVISION OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON
CASE NO: 5:16-CV-00479-KKC
SANDRA K. NICOLS, et al.

NOV 14 2017
AT LEXINGTON
~'
ROBERT R CAR
JLERK u.s. DISTRICT ~OURT

PLAINTIFFS

v.
1ST STOP, INC., et al.

DEFENDANTS
OPINION & ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Cintas Corporation No.2's Motion to Dismiss
Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

Having been

sufficiently advised, and noting that subsequent to the filing of Defendant Cintas No. 2's Motion
to Dismiss, Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed Defendant Cintas No. 2 pursuant to FRCP 4l(a),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Defendant Cintas Corporation No. 2's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint is
DENIED as moot.

Dated November /3,2017

UNIT D

CALDWELL, CHIEF JUDGE
ATES DISTRICT COURT
N DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY