Nichols et al v. Cantrell's 1st Stop, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER & OPINION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant Cintas Corporation No 2's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/14/2017. (KM)cc: COR, Atty Hill via U.S. mail. Modified text on 11/14/2017 (KM).

Download PDF
Eastern District of Kentun~ ~ILED V4J UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DIVISION OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON CASE NO: 5:16-CV-00479-KKC SANDRA K. NICOLS, et al. NOV 14 2017 AT LEXINGTON ~' ROBERT R CAR JLERK u.s. DISTRICT ~OURT PLAINTIFFS v. 1ST STOP, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS OPINION & ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Cintas Corporation No.2's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Having been sufficiently advised, and noting that subsequent to the filing of Defendant Cintas No. 2's Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed Defendant Cintas No. 2 pursuant to FRCP 4l(a), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant Cintas Corporation No. 2's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint is DENIED as moot. Dated November /3,2017 UNIT D CALDWELL, CHIEF JUDGE ATES DISTRICT COURT N DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?