Young v. Quintana

Filing 7

JUDGMENT: 1. Dazzle Young's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 1 is DENIED. 2. Judgment is entered in favor of the Respondent with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 3. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 4. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 7/12/2018.(STC)cc: Petitioner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON
DAZZLE YOUNG,
Petitioner,
v.
FRANCISCO QUINTANA, Warden,
Respondent.
***

***

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
***

Civil No. 5: 18-125-JMH

JUDGMENT

***

Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered
this date, and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1.

Dazzle Young’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [R. 1] is DENIED.
2.

Judgment is entered in favor of the Respondent with

respect to all issues raised in this proceeding.
3.

This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court’s

docket.
4.

This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no

just cause for delay.
This 12th day of July, 2018.

2