Davis v. Omnicare, Inc. et al

Filing 139

JUDGMENT: Consistent with the Opinion & Order entered today, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court: 1. GRANTS DE 133 ; 2. DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's complaint (DE 1 ) and all claims in that pleading, per t he Opinion & Order and Settlement Agreement; and, 3. STRIKES this matter from the Court's active docket, although the Court will retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing the terms of the parties' approved Settlement Agreement. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 9/14/21.(JLM)cc: COR

Case: 5:18-cv-00142-REW-MAS Doc #: 139 Filed: 09/14/21 Page: 1 of 1 - Page ID#:
10044

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION
LEXINGTON
DANIEL DAVIS, individually and on
behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
OMNICARE, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

No. 5:18-CV-142-REW
JUDGMENT

*** *** *** ***
Consistent with the Opinion & Order entered today, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 58, the Court:
1. GRANTS DE 133;
2. DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s complaint (DE 1) and all claims in
that pleading, per the Opinion & Order and Settlement Agreement; and,
3. STRIKES this matter from the Court’s active docket, although the Court will retain
jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing the terms of the parties’ approved
Settlement Agreement.
This the 14th day of September, 2021.

1