Purvis v. Bottom

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION: (1) Magistrate Judge's Ingram's Recommended Disposition (Doc. # 19 ) be, and is hereby, ADOPTED as the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the Court; (2) Petitioner's petition for W rit of Habeas Corpus (Doc. # 1 ) be, and is hereby, DENIED; (3) For reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Disposition (Doc. # 19 ), the Court determines there would be no arguable merit for an appeal in this matter and , therefore, NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; and(4) This matter be, and is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 09/13/2017.(KJA)cc: COR, mailed paper copy to pro se filer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
SOUTHERN DIVISION
AT LONDON
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-278-DLB-HAI
SHANE PURVIS
vs.

PETITIONER

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

DON BOTTOM, Warden

RESPONDENT
********************

This matter is before the Court on the Recommended Disposition of Magistrate
Judge Hanly A. Ingram (Doc. # 19), wherein he recommends that Shane Purvis’ pro se
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. # 1) be dismissed
as meritless. No objections to the Recommended Disposition having been filed and the
time to do so having expired, the Recommended Disposition is ripe for the Court’s review.
Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Disposition, the Court
concludes that it is sound in all respects, and agrees that Mr. Purvis’ Writ should be
denied. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
(1)

Magistrate Judge’s Ingram’s Recommended Disposition (Doc. # 19) be, and

is hereby, ADOPTED as the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the Court;
(2)

Petitioner’s petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. # 1) be, and is hereby,

DENIED;

1

(3)

For reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Disposition

(Doc. # 19), the Court determines there would be no arguable merit for an appeal in this
matter and, therefore, NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; and
(4)

This matter be, and is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and

STRICKEN from the Court’s active docket.
This 13th day of September, 2017.

K:\DATA\ORDERS\London\2016\17-278 Order Adopting R&R on 2254.docx

2