The Monticello Banking Company et al v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al

Filing 41

OPINION & ORDER: 1) Plaintiffs' motion to leave to file a First Amended Complaint (DE 37 ) is GRANTED; 2) the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to file the tendered First Amended Complaint (DE 37 -1) with accompanying exhibits (DE 37 -2 7) into the record; 3) Defendants SHALL file an answer or response to the First Amended Complaint pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 4) Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss Counts 1 through 4 of their complaint (DE 34 ) is DENIED as moot; and 5) the STAY of this matter is LIFTED. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 01/28/2025.(KJA)cc: COR

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON THE MONTICELLO BANKING COMPANY, et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:23-cv-00148-KKC Plaintiffs, v. OPINION & ORDER CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, et al., Defendants. *** *** *** The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1) Plaintiffs’ motion to leave to file a First Amended Complaint (DE 37) is GRANTED; 2) the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to file the tendered First Amended Complaint (DE 37-1) with accompanying exhibits (DE 37-2 – 7) into the record; 3) Defendants SHALL file an answer or response to the First Amended Complaint pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 4) Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss Counts 1 through 4 of their complaint (DE 34) is DENIED as moot; and 5) the STAY of this matter is LIFTED. This 28th day of January, 2025. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?