Muhammad v. USA

Filing 125

JUDGMENT: (1) All First, Fifth, and Eighth Amendment constitutional claims asserted by Pla Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad are DISMISSED with prejudice. (2) Judgment IS ENTERED in favor of named dfts. (3) This is a FINAL and APPEAL ABLE ORDER and there is no just cause for delay. (4) Court certifies action has been filed in bad faith and that any resultingappeal would not be taken in good faith. (5) This action [7:07-CV-68-GFVT] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and IS STRICKEN from Court's active docket. Signed by Gregory F. VanTatenhove. (TDA)cc: COR & Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) *** *** *** ***

Civil No. 07-68-GFVT

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously with this Judgment, and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: (1) All First, Fifth, and Eighth Amendment constitutional claims asserted by Plaintiff

Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad are DISMISSED with prejudice. (2) (3) delay. (4) The Court certifies that this action has been filed in bad faith and that any resulting Judgment IS ENTERED in favor of the named defendants. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE ORDER and there is no just cause for

appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997). (5) This action [7:07-CV-68-GFVT] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and IS

STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. This the 25th day of September, 2009.

2