Harris v. Rios

Filing 9

JUDGMENT: it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. The Petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by James Reed Harris against Respondent Hector A. Rios, Jr. R. 2 is DENIED, and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of theRespondent. 2. The Court ce rtifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997). Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 5/26/09.(MCB)cc: COR w/NOE & copy via first class mail to James Reed Harris w/NOE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at PIKEVILLE JAMES REED HARRIS, Petitioner, v. HECTOR A. RIOS, JR., Respondent. | | | | | | | | |

Civil Action No. 08-CV-32-KKC

JUDGMENT

***** ***** ***** ***** Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. The Petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by James Reed Harris against

Respondent Hector A. Rios, Jr. [R. 2] is DENIED, and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Respondent. 2. The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(3); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997). Dated this 26th day of May, 2009.