Dobson v. Gray et al

Filing 9

JUDGMENT: it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. The Complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Pla, Ardith Dobson against Dfts David D. Gray; Ed Sheymleya; Tim Ingles; Barry Adams; and Keith Hensley R. 2 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE & Judgm ent is ENTERED in favor of the Defendants. 2. The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(a)(3); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); Kincade v. Sparkman, 17 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997). Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 6/4/09.(MCB)cc: COR w/NOE Ardith Dobson via first class mail & US Atty EDKY

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION AT PIKEVILLE ARDITH DOBSON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID D. GRAY, ET AL., Defendants. ***** ***** | | | | | | | | | Civil Action No. 7:09-CV-63-KKC JUDGMENT ***** ***** Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. The Complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Ardith Dobson against Defendants David D. Gray; Ed Sheymleya; Tim Ingles; Barry Adams; and Keith Hensley [R. 2] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendants. 2. The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997). Dated this 3rd day of June, 2009.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?