Fraley v. Zuercher

Filing 8

JUDGMENT: it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. The petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by Kevin Fraley against J.C. Zuercher as Respondent R. 2 is DENIED, and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Respondent. 2. The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997). Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 7/30/09.(MCB)cc: COR w/NOE & Copy w/NOE to Kevin Fraley via first class mail

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE KEVIN FRALEY, Petitioner, v. J.C. ZUERCHER, Respondent. | | | | | | | | | Civil Action No. 09-82-KKC JUDGMENT **** **** **** **** Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. The petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Kevin Fraley against J.C. Zuercher as Respondent [R. 2] is DENIED, and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Respondent. 2. The Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949 (6th Cir. 1997). Dated this 30th day of July, 2009.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?