Wells v. Pepsi Bottling Group et al

Filing 40

JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. JUDGMENT is entered in f avor of Dft, Bottling Group, LLC, with respect to pla John Wells's claim for wrongful discharge. Wells's remaining negligence claim against dft and his claim against his coworker are REMANDED to the Pike Circuit Court. 2. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 6/8/2011. (TDA)cc: COR & Pike Circuit Court (certified copy w/ attested docket sheet)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE JOHN WELLS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. BOTTLING GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. *** *** Civil Action No. 10-99-ART JUDGMENT *** *** In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Defendant, Bottling Group, LLC, with respect to the plaintiff John Wells’s claim for wrongful discharge. Wells’s remaining negligence claim against the defendant and his claim against his coworker are REMANDED to the Pike Circuit Court. 2. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court’s docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. This the 8th day of June 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?