Bey v. Sepanek
Filing
14
JUDGMENT: 1. The petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Rodorrio Wells R. 1 is DENIED with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the respondent.3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 6/5/17.(MJY)cc: COR, Well-Bey via US. Mail
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
SOUTHERN DIVISION at PIKEVILLE
RODORRIO WELLS,
Petitioner,
Civil Action No. 7: 16-123-KKC
V.
MICHAEL SEPANEK, Warden,
JUDGMENT
Respondent.
*** *** *** ***
Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure 58 it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
1.
The petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 by Rodorrio Wells [R. 1] is
DENIED with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding.
2.
Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the respondent.
3.
This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for
delay.
Dated June 5, 2017.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?