Bey v. Sepanek

Filing 14

JUDGMENT: 1. The petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Rodorrio Wells R. 1 is DENIED with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the respondent.3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 6/5/17.(MJY)cc: COR, Well-Bey via US. Mail

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at PIKEVILLE RODORRIO WELLS, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 7: 16-123-KKC V. MICHAEL SEPANEK, Warden, JUDGMENT Respondent. *** *** *** *** Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. The petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 by Rodorrio Wells [R. 1] is DENIED with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the respondent. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Dated June 5, 2017. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?