Ratcliff v. USP Big Sandy

Filing 7

JUDGMENT: 1. The petition filed pursuant by David Ratcliff R. 1 is DENIED with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Respondent. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/15/18.(MJY)cc: COR, Pro Se filer via US Mail. Modified document type on 3/15/2018 (MJY).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at PIKEVILLE DAVID MARC RATCLIFF, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 7: 17-151-KKC V. JUDGMENT USP BIG SANDY, Respondent. *** *** *** *** Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 by David Ratcliff [R. 1] is DENIED with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Respondent. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Entered March 15, 2018. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?